Aug 20, 2003|
Risk-return tradeoff gets thumbs down
Surprisingly, a large section of the investing community (54%) consider themselves proficient enough to gauge a good mutual fund investment on the strength of its portfolio. That was the most significant finding of the latest poll conducted on our website.
Over half the visitors Ė 54%, polled in the survey opined that they would select a mutual fund based on the fund portfolio. Nearly a third of the audience (32%) said they would select a fund based on the (reputation of the) asset management company/fund house. The fund manager was a good enough reason to invest for 14% of the viewers.
The results of the poll are significant because investors seemed to find themselves up to the task of gauging a mutual fund portfolio in selecting the Ďrightí mutual fund. To research and comprehend the dynamics that drive a single stock/sector can be quite a demanding task. A mutual fund portfolio has several stocks (starting from 20) and sectors (starting from 15)! That is why even a fund manager finds himself incapable to do this all by himself and employs a team of analysts to assist him. And we havenít even started discussing debt funds where competent fund management skills are as, if not more critical. If we have 54% of our visitors who believe they can do this all by themselves, then we have a latent fund management potential in the country that must be tapped!
We believe, that there are a variety of factors apart from the fund portfolio that investors need to consider before selecting a mutual fund.
Investors need to understand that a portfolio only indicates the investments of a mutual fund at a point in time. By itself it means very little. If investors do believe in looking at a fundís portfolio, they should probably look at the fundís trailing 5-10 monthsí portfolios. This will allow them to understand the fund managerís style of investment over a period of time, i.e. whether he is an investor or a punter.
Understanding the fund managerís style is important mainly because it dictates the risk profile of the mutual fund. A fund managerís investment philosophy (concentrated bets, diversified portfolio, large caps, mid caps) gives the fund a particular risk profile. Investors need to gauge the risk profile of the fund well.
Understanding the risk profile of the fund is critical to understand whether it fits your own risk profile. There is nothing wrong in a fund manager adopting a conservative or aggressive strategy per se, so long as this has been adequately conveyed to the investor. Often the problem lies in the way the fund has been projected or sold by the fund house. In 1999-2000, sectoral funds were sold as an easy way to make money by taking on moderate risk while there was nothing farther from the truth. There is nothing unethical in a sectoral fund, but it can become unethical if the risk-return trade-off is not sufficiently communicated to the investor. We believe this is the most significant factor that investors must consider before choosing a particular fund i.e. to match the fundís risk profile with your own.
A long-standing track record of performance and delivering value under various phases (bullish as well as bearish) over an extended time frame of 3-5 years is another very big plus.
The track record of the sponsors/AMC/fund house is also a very important factor. Investors draw comfort from knowing that the sponsors have adequate fund management experience and have a clean slate untainted by scams and financial irregularities.
In our interview with Mr Vivek Reddy (ex-CEO of Pioneer ITI Mutual Fund, which was acquired by Franklin Templeton Investments), he had this to say about his selection criteria for a mutual fund, ĎOn a scale of 1 to 100, where 100 indicates a fail-safe investment decision, I would give track record, portfolio and performance a weightage of about 15%. I would give expenses a weightage of 10%. I would give service levels, responsiveness a weightage of 10%. The sponsors and promoters would get a weightage of 5%. That leaves you covered for 40%. I would say thatís about the best an investor can do and leave the rest to God!í
More Views on News
Mar 10, 2016
An opportunity to find an impeccably trustworthy and competent financial guardian is in the offing.
Feb 29, 2016
Most financial planners come out as whiz kids who throw around financial jargon. But financial planning can be actually easy, provided one follows a disciplined approach.
Feb 12, 2016
PersonalFN highlights the benefits of parking a portion of your expenses in e-wallets and using them efficiently.
Feb 2, 2016
Mutual funds take a bearish call on the FMCG sector. The sector has started playing out due to a combination of slower growth and expensive valuations.
Feb 1, 2016
Ethical practices help build long lasting relationships, and healthy long-term business relationships are often mutually rewarding. But PersonalFN is of the view that the financial services industry in India seems to have forgotten this.
More Views on News
Aug 17, 2017
A small-cap Indian company with high-return potential and blue-chip-like stability is set to supplant the Chinese players in this niche segment.
Aug 10, 2017
Bill connects the dots...between money and growth, real money and real resources, gold and cryptocurrencies...and between gold, cryptocurrencies, and time.
Aug 16, 2017
The IT Sector could be in an uptrend till February 2019. Are you prepared to ride the trend?
Aug 10, 2017
Bitcoin hits an all-time high, is there more upside left?
Aug 16, 2017
Ensure your financial Independence, and pledge to start the journey towards financial freedom today!
Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement. LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here
. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407