X

Sign up for Equitymaster's free daily newsletter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get access to our latest Multibagger guide (2017 Edition) on picking money-making stocks.

This is an entirely free service. No payments are to be made.


Download Now Subscribe to our free daily e-letter, The 5 Minute WrapUp and get this complimentary report.
We hate spam as much as you do. Check out our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.
A perfect example of bad management at work - Views on News from Equitymaster
 
 
  • PRINT
  • E-MAIL
  • FEEDBACK
  • A  A  A
  • Dec 15, 2009

    A perfect example of bad management at work

    Some businesses have all the luck in the world while some others don't. We are referring to a type of classification of businesses. And in this classification, just two categories exist. Capital intensive businesses and non-capital intensive businesses. Now, there is no hard and fast rule that separates the two. At least not to our knowledge. In other words, we cannot draw a line thick enough between the two.

    So, how do we classify them? As with other things in investing, let us use part art and part science here. Common sense suggests that businesses exist in order to increase their revenues. And how do they increase their revenues? Simple. They do so by building new plants and investing more in working capital.

    Well, that nails it then. Capital intensive businesses are those businesses where in order to increase revenues, substantial capital investments need to be made. The other half of the classification answers itself. Non capital intensive businesses would then be those businesses where growth is not as much dependent on capital investments as on other things.

    Let us illustrate with examples. Consider the steel industry. It is a highly capital intensive industry in every sense of the word. Leaving realizations aside, if you want to double your revenues, simply pour in more capital and double the capacity. Let us go to the other end of the spectrum. Here, let us take the example of the IT industry. Tomorrow, if Infosys come out with a plan to double its revenues, it simply has to double the headcount and invest a tiny-winy amount as a proportion of its revenues in making a building that could accommodate all the new employees.

    Here, the capital investment gone towards the construction of new building has hardly made any dent to the capital structure of Infosys. This is in sharp contrast to the capex incurred during the capacity doubling of the steel company. Thus, it follows from these examples that while the steel company is capital intensive, IT companies like Infosys are not.

    Infact, the capital for IT companies and other such companies that rely mostly on intangible assets could be things like human capital and brand equity. And as long as these companies try and preserve the intangible assets, they have an advantage over the capital intensive industries in that they can generate huge amounts of surplus cash.

    Thus, the question that arises is what should these companies do with the surplus cash? If it is a sensible management, it could give it all back to shareholders in the form of dividends or some such arrangement.

    However, there are some management that find silly reasons to not give it back to shareholders. Instead, they take the excess capital and put it into capital intensive industries. There can't be a worse use of excess profits than this, could there be? And there could never be a better example of bad management at work. For investing in a cash generating machine only to see the cash being evaporated in a capital intensive business is perhaps the most surefire way to get a ticket to the poorhouse.

     

     

    Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "A perfect example of bad management at work". Click here!

    1 Responses to "A perfect example of bad management at work"

    Manu

    Dec 15, 2009

    there are a few considerations that should weigh on managements when making capital allocation and capital enhancement decisions
    - the cost of (incremental) capital vs. the (incremental) return on (incremental) capital employed. If this is negative, this leads to negative "value added"
    - the gestation period of capital employed - some projects take a long time to start giving returns, even if the projected returns are excellent

    In your example (of an IT company), ahidden factor is the time it takes to make the new employees productive. With a huge scarcity of good IT people, IT companies hire (good) people from any discipline and then spend considerable time and energy in training them, so even in their case, the returns are not really immediate, even if the incremental capital is (as you say) small.

    Like 
      
    Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "A perfect example of bad management at work". Click here!
     

    More Views on News

    How to Ride Alongside India's Best Fund Managers (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Jun 10, 2017

    Forty Indian investing gurus, as worthy of imitation as the legendary Peter Lynch, can help you get rich in the stock market.

    Mr Trump Has Been Broken (Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 24, 2017

    Kelly, Mattis, McMaster, Cohn, and Mnuchin are in charge. But these Pentagon bureaucrats and Wall Street hustlers may be worse than a loose-cannon president.

    Were You Lured By Mr Market's Bait? (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 23, 2017

    Mr Market lured investors into believing they'd bitten into a crash. Did you take the bait?

    Deep State First (Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 23, 2017

    Nowhere was the darkness deeper than in the nation's capital. There, no light shone. No flicker of awareness...observation...learning...or reflection appeared.

    Why Hasn't Warren Buffett Rung the Bell Yet? (The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 22, 2017

    It's surprising Warren Buffett hasn't warned investors about the expensive stock market? Let us know why.

    More Views on News

    Most Popular

    This Small Cap Can Drive Chinese Players Out of India (and Make a Fortune in the Process)(The 5 Minute Wrapup)

    Aug 17, 2017

    A small-cap Indian company with high-return potential and blue-chip-like stability is set to supplant the Chinese players in this niche segment.

    Dear PM Modi, India is Already Land of Self-Employed, and It Ain't Working(Vivek Kaul's Diary)

    Aug 21, 2017

    Most Indians who cannot find jobs, look at becoming self-employed.

    It's the Best Time to Buy IT Stocks(Daily Profit Hunter)

    Aug 16, 2017

    The IT Sector could be in an uptrend till February 2019. Are you prepared to ride the trend?

    5 Steps To Become Financially Independent(Outside View)

    Aug 16, 2017

    Ensure your financial Independence, and pledge to start the journey towards financial freedom today!

    Think Twice Before You Keep Money In A Savings Bank Account(Outside View)

    Aug 22, 2017

    Post demonetisation, a cut in bank savings deposits rates was in the offing.

    More
    Copyright © Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.
    Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement.

    LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Equitymaster is not an Investment Adviser. Information herein should be regarded as a resource only and should be used at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual subscribers. Before acting on any recommendation, subscribers should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. This is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA or Canada, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Equitymaster or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.

    SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.

    Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.
    Telephone: +91-22-61434055. Fax: +91-22-22028550. Email: info@equitymaster.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com. CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407
     

    Become A Smarter Investor In
    Just 5 Minutes

    Multibagger Stocks Guide 2017
    Get our special report, Multibagger Stocks Guide (2017 Edition) Now!
    We will never sell or rent your email id.
    Please read our Terms

    S&P BSE SENSEX


    Aug 24, 2017 11:06 AM

    MARKET STATS